logo IMB
Retour

Séminaire de Théorie des Nombres

Serre's uniformity in the split Cartan case

Pierre Parent

Salle de conférences

le 17 octobre 2008 à 14:00

Let EE be an elliptic curve over Q\bf Q, without complex multiplication over Q\overline{\bf Q}. For pp a prime number, consider the representation Gal(Q/Q)GL(E[p])GL2(Fp){\mathrm{Gal}}(\overline{\bf Q} /{\bf Q})\to GL (E[p])\simeq GL_2 ({\bf F}_p ) induced by the Galois action on the group of pp-torsion points of EE. A theorem of Serre, published in 1972, asserts that there exists an integer BEB_E such that the above representation is surjective for pp larger than BEB_E. Serre then asked the following question: can BEB_E be chosen independently of EE? The classification of maximal subgroups of GL2(Fp)GL_2 ({\bf F}_p ) shows that this boils down to proving the triviality, for large enough pp, of the sets of rational points of four families of modular curves, namely X0(p)X_0 (p), Xsplit(p)X_{\mathrm{split}} (p), Xnonsplit(p)X_{\mathrm{non-split}} (p) and XA4(p)X_{{\frak A}_4} (p) (we say that a point of one of those curves is {\it trivial} if it is either a cusp, or the underlying isomorphism class of elliptic curves has complex multiplication over Q\overline{\bf Q}). The (so-called exceptional) case of XA4(p)X_{{\frak A}_4} (p) was ruled out by Serre. The fact that X0(p)(Q)X_0 (p)({\bf Q} ) is made of only cusps for p>163p>163 is a well-known theorem of Mazur. In this talk we will present a proof that Xsplit(p)(Q)X_{\mathrm{split}} (p)({\bf Q}) is trivial for large enough pp (joint work with Yuri Bilu).